Compared to the ATF’s 2015 Theft/Loss report, that’s a 124% increase in the total firearms reported lost/stolen (14,800 in 2015), a 150% increase in the number of firearms stolen (6,163 in 2015), and a 105% increase in the number of firearms lost (8,637 in 2015).
Here’s a chart showing the breakdown of reports by category of firearm and type of report:
FFL Requirement to Report Thefts/Losses
Under federal firearms laws and ATF rules and regulations, Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) are required to report the theft or loss of a firearm within 48 hours of determining that the firearm was lost or stolen. There is a specific process that must be followed – not only in making the report properly but also in ensuring that the FFL’s records are updated to properly reflect that the report has been made so that they aren’t cited with a violation of the Gun Control Act (GCA) during their next ATF compliance inspection. If you’re curious about these requirements, consider taking our course on ATF Firearms Compliance. In that course, we also explain how to avoid potential problems with local law enforcement if there’s no reason to believe that criminal activity occurred (i.e. truly lost instead of stolen).
[bctt tweet=”An FFL only has 48 hours to report a firearm they’ve determined to be lost or stolen.” username=”rocketffl”]
The ATF report also included data on the number and type of reports by state.
Most reports made: Texas (248)
Most firearms reported: Georgia (1,539)
Most burglary reports: Georgia (58)
Most burglary firearms: Georgia (1,069)
Most larceny reports: Texas (85)
Most larceny firearms: California (162)
Most robbery reports: Texas (10)
Most robbery firearms: Texas (151)
Most loss reports: Florida (106)
Most lost firearms: Alabama (842)
Here’s some charts showing the breakdown of reports by state and type of report:
In their report, ATF added the following info:
ATF data provides that the 10 FFLs with the most firearms reported in Theft/Loss Reports are associated with 2,582 firearms reported lost or stolen. This data is limited to Type 01 (Dealer in firearms other than destructive devices) and Type 02 (Pawnbroker in firearms other than destructive devices) FFLs.
ATF data provides that the 100* FFLs with the most firearms reported in Theft/Loss Reports are associated with 7,664 firearms reported lost or stolen. This data is limited to Type 01 (Dealer in firearms other than destructive devices) and Type 02 (Pawnbroker in firearms other than destructive devices) FFLs.* There were 8 FFLs tied in the final ranking of the 100 Type 01 and Type 02 FFLs resulting in 107 total FFLs.
FFL Firearm Theft / Loss Totals Compared by Year
The ATF has been publishing similar reports since 2012. For a comparison of the total number of firearms reported lost or stolen by FFLs each year along with a break-down between how many were lost vs. stolen, see the below graph.
Ryan Cleckner is a former special operations sniper and current attorney specializing in firearms law/ATF compliance and is a firearms industry executive (former govt. relations manager for NSSF, Vice President of Remington Outdoor Company, and a SAAMI voting board member).
Recommended Posts
Type 7 FFL – What it is and How to Get One
A Type 7 FFL is one of 9 types of Federal Firearm Licenses which allows the FFL holder to manufacture firearms and ammunition as a business. The Type 7 FFL is commonly called the “manufacturer’s FFL,” however, there are technically three different types of manufacturing license: In addition to manufacturing standard firearms, the Type 07 […]
By Ryan Cleckner
922r Compliance – Imported Firearms
If you’ve already been looking into 922r compliance, then you likely already know how confusing it can seem. Worry not – I’m a firearms attorney and although this isn’t legal advice because I’m not YOUR attorney, I’ve represented hundred of clients across the country on firearm legal matters and can explain the 18 USC 922r […]
By Ryan Cleckner
ATF’s “Zero Tolerance” Policy is Over!
The Biden administration introduced a horrible policy called “Zero Tolerance” that was detrimental to the firearms industry – specifically, FFLs. Instead of being an agency that is intended to regulate and work with the firearm industry, the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) became even more hostile to the industry and started treating […]
[…] The report continues by breaking down all of the information state-by-state. You can check out the full report here. […]